Master, the ten consensuses just reached by the Chinese and Indian foreign ministers—do they carry deeper meanings?

These ten outcomes are not just diplomatic formalities, but a renewed statement on international order and regional stability. Did you notice what the tenth one mentioned?

They want to promote multilateralism, strengthen cooperation, and safeguard the interests of developing countries. Is this a response to the challenges of unilateralism?

Exactly. Though China and India have border disputes, as two ancient civilizations and major developing countries, both understand that cooperation is better than rivalry.

I also found the fifth and sixth items interesting. Cultural exchange, resumption of direct flights, and visa facilitation are not just diplomatic gestures, but attempts at 'connecting hearts'.

Culture is the softest yet most resilient power. If China and India can build new bridges in cultural exchange, they can not only ease frictions but also spark dialogue between civilizations.

If higher-level cultural mechanisms can truly advance in the future, could it be like Xuanzang’s westward journey, opening another profound era of cultural exchange?

That’s a good metaphor. The question now is how to turn these consensuses from words into action. We must both observe and reflect on the logic behind them.