Master, recently the lawsuit between Pang Donglai and the influencer '柴怼怼' gained attention. '柴怼怼' claimed that Pang Donglai made huge profits by selling low-cost Hetian jade, but official inspection proved Pang Donglai innocent. What do you think about this phenomenon?

Online supervision is a good thing in principle, but everything has a boundary. If supervision turns into deliberate slander and damages a company's reputation, it goes against the original intent of oversight and becomes a form of extortion that harms the healthy development of the business environment.

That's true. I saw on some short video platforms that similar 'malicious accusation' behavior is quite common. Some people even exploit negative information for malicious hype. This trend is really worrying.

As the ancient saying goes, 'Too many words lead to mistakes.' This is even more true in the internet age. Supervision must be evidence-based and measured, or it risks becoming a tool for spreading rumors. The Cyberspace Administration’s 'Clean Web' campaign is drawing a clear line between oversight and defamation to maintain good social order.

It seems that even supervisors themselves need to be supervised. Freedom of speech doesn't mean one can attack others without any limits.

Exactly. The line between supervision and defamation is very thin. As members of the public, we must be brave enough to supervise, but also rational in discerning information, and not be misled by false claims. Only then can we truly promote social progress and harmony.