Hua, did you see the news? In Chongqing, a civil servant ranked first in the selection exam but still wasn’t chosen in the end.

I saw it too, and I was quite shocked. He passed the written exam, interview, and medical check, but was stopped at the assessment stage.

Procedurally speaking, assessment is indeed important, but the problem is that the standards aren’t transparent, which makes it feel unfair.

Exactly. And the reasons given, like ‘not receiving full marks’ or ‘job mismatch,’ weren’t clearly stated when applying.

That raises the issue of whether the rules are consistent from start to finish. Civil servant selection emphasizes openness, fairness, and justice—there shouldn’t be vague handling.

From a candidate’s perspective, after putting in so much effort, not getting a clear explanation would create a huge psychological gap.

Working at the grassroots level, I’ve felt that overly subjective assessments can easily cause disputes.

I hope the relevant departments can clearly explain assessment standards so everyone is convinced—only then will the system have greater credibility.